Monday, May 25, 2009

Destination Of Science. Sorry .. "Science of Destination"

If u are a fool enough to believe 'destination' , u must be clever enough to understand 'science'.

"I got 99.9 percentile. It was my parent's support and my hard work :) "
"I got calls from all the IIMs. I dint convert even one. My fate!!!"

Are fate and destination are always invited for negative endings? but why?
Seriously, these are okay to listen to. But if some one ever talks about the great concept of destination when he just forgot to take tissues to the toilet , how will you feel.?

The people who know themselves know their destinations.
Others try hard. When they win they talk about their 'hard work'
When they lose they talk about their 'destination'

Well what is destination? When every things is predetermined, why do we try ? Why don we let the chips fall where they may ?
But still destination not that easily questionable word.

Science can explain destination though they are big time enemies.
"Time Machine. Time Machine. Time Machine." We see this in Stanley Kubrick movies, but not in our physics book cos
its not proved practically. To an extent not even theoretically.
All it demands is quite simple. Some one should travel at the speed of 1080000000 km/h - speed of light.

Let us go back to our high school physics book to grab the most wanted phrase in physics - Let x be y and y be z. :))
Let Time Machine be built in 2025.

A and B, the best enemies ever work for Infosys as software engineers. A and B write CAT 2009. A fails and gives up, B cracks it. After 20 years in 2029, A has gains a lot of experience in Infosys as software engineer and B comes back to Infosys as CEO. So the first thing she is about to do is :) fire A. A realizes the danger and regrets for giving up CAT 2009. He decides to correct it. He travels back in time with his four year old Time Machine.

He prepares die hard to crack the CAT 2009 but he is not at able to do it because already in 2009, 240 students entered IIM A and they are big time CEO s in 2029, the time from which he came back. So he cant change their destination and so his.

He tries another trick(in 2009). Killing B.!! Killing B to save his career in 2029.
He misses every attempt because B has given birth to a boy in 2020 and the nine year old is playing football with B in 2029. Which means killing B is totally impossible at least for the fact that B's child will become a null entity.
Even if he tries to explode B with a Nuclear bomb, A cant kill B!

That is Destination!! I mean FUCKING DESTINATION!!!

sorry i got confused with the tenses.. :) for obvious reasons..

9 comments:

  1. WOW - What a post to start one's blog!!!!

    Words right out from the mouth of a 99.9%er.. enjoyed reading it man.. Destination of Science.. NO NO.. 'Science of Destination' :P

    the part i liked the most - the TIME MACHINE story.. Few thoughts: B is ofcourse not u (u used she, so its a girl :)).. then A maybe u (though i must say u hv cracked CAT big-time this time man :)) hmmm.. so if A is Jaggie bhai.. and B is his best enemy who is a girl.. then......
    well seems like i m getting confused now.. he he :D

    Keep up the good work mate!!
    Cheers,
    Jitin

    ReplyDelete
  2. All the characters, colleges and scores involved are fictional :P .. he hehe!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. dai jagan yannada achchu????

    yaru pethapillayo ippidi aeiduche....

    ReplyDelete
  4. nice post dude... the best part r the stories in both the posts... cooooool..... great work buddy!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. hey jaggie....came to your bog from nitie thread on orkut..
    nice post dude...
    even I got rejected by IIM-L and XLRI...so could connect to the story...the time machine part added a humorous touch to it...
    neways...lets meet at NITIE..

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. null entity - that was a coool one!! I hv a doubt though... y is it that wen a train/bus doesnt reach its destination on time.. we blame the driver/system and not fate!! BTW jaggi... ur 1st post doesnt seem to be a 1st one.. good work!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. @s
    thanks a lot dude.

    We blame the driver b cos we have someone in first hand to blame :D

    else we ll go blame the fate itself..

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good one machan. Have you seen movie Butterfly effect, first part. It has height of this go-back-correct-logic. Try this movie if you missed it.

    ReplyDelete